Who "Owns" PACS: Radiology or Central IT in Hospitals?

Veteran readers of this blog will probably know that I am a strong proponent of having laboratory professionals "manage" their own LISs. Lab tests results are a strategic asset in hospitals, underlying about 70% of hospital diagnoses and constituting about 70% of the data contained in electronic medical records. How does one determine who manages (i.e., owns) the LIS? Easy! Who makes the decisions regarding access to lab information? Who formats that information? Who has the final word on policy issues regarding that information. Who has both de jure and de facto control (i.e., stewardship) over it? If you need to pull out an org chart to answer these questions, you are in trouble. Needless to say, I was interested in a recent article (see: Who owns PACS -- Radiology or IT?) about this same question as it applies to radiology information and images. Below is a longish excerpt from the article with boldface emphasis mine:

Should radiology or the IT department take responsibility for managing PACS in a hospital? It depends on the facility's corporate culture and the level of sophistication of the IT department, an animated "debate" at the 2008 Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine (SIIM) meeting concluded. The premise of the argument presented by Dr. Paul J. Chang on behalf of IT department ownership is that PACS technology has become a component of the entire hospital informatics enterprise rather than its own unique entity. In an increasing number of hospital infrastructures, dedicated networks for PACS are unnecessary. Thick-client workstations are facing obsolescence....Modern healthcare IT should be structured as a matrix, according to Chang, who straddles both worlds as vice chairman of radiology informatics and director of pathology informatics at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine....Because PACS is the multimedia component of an electronic health record (EHR), the EHR must be optimized to support radiology workflow. Not only is this a complex undertaking, but it logically fits as the responsibility of the IT department -- as long as the IT department has a global vision and a progressive philosophy, Chang said.

Dr. David Channin, chief of imaging informatics at Northwestern Memorial Hospital and the Feinberg School of Medicine in Chicago, disagreed. "Radiology has led informatics technology innovation in hospitals and will continue to be the source of informatics leadership in healthcare," Channin said. "Domain expertise must take precedence over IT expertise. Tools don't drive domain innovation. If controlled in a central manner, such as a matrix structure, the priorities of a radiology department will be subjected to control by an IT department juggling priorities representing multiple domains in a hospital," he said. "If you don't have budgetary control of your bucket of allocated capital dollars, you have lost control. Your critically needed PACS upgrade will be competing with acquisition of a new laser doodad for OR." Radiology departments should wield the power they have as cash cows for hospitals, define their IT domain borders, provide access to them with standard interfaces, and demand autonomy, according to Channin. He recommended that radiology departments contract with IT departments for "commodity services" such as networks, virtual operating systems, and data storage.

Well, no one can say that Drs. Chang  and Channin did not speak their minds in this spirited exchange. There is too much interesting material here to cover at one time. Here are some of my initial reactions:

• Matrix shamtrix. You either own the LIS/RIS/PACS or you don't. See my discussion above about system management/ownership. Pathology owns (or should own) lab information and pathology images and radiology owns (or should own) radiology information and images. Central IT + clinical personnel should then negotiate with pathology and radiology for access to the information managed by the latter two groups.
• According to Dr. Channin, "radiology has led informatics technology innovation in hospitals." LISs were developed and commercialized in the late 1970s and thus preceded RISs by at least five years in hospitals. AIMCL, the LIS conference that preceded Lab InfoTech Summit, was launched in 1983. Radiologists are the acknowledged leaders in hospital image management and storage. Let's call it a draw.
• I agree with Dr. Channin regarding the IT capital and operating budget for the LIS and RIS. If you don't control the information system budget, you don't control the information system.
• I have no problem with the central IT departments providing "commodity services" to pathology and radiology. They are best able to provide institution-wide services like networks and generic data storage for the entire institution. However, I believe that the latter is now a commodity and best provided via a vertical cloud (see: A Closer Look at the Vertical Cloud in Healthcare Computing; The Potential for "Sereverless" Healthcare Computing).