I recently raised the issue of how patient symptoms are generally not very helpful in distinguishing ovarian cancer from other gynecologic non-neoplastic diseases (see: Patient Symptoms Inadequate Way to Diagnose Ovarian Cancer). This finding emphasizes the need to discover a biomarker with adequate sensitivity and specificity for ovarian cancer screening. A recent article presented the news that Abbott Labs will debut an automated HE4 assay for monitoring patients with a history of ovarian cancer but not for ovarian cancer screening (see: Abbott Labs Expects to Debut Epithelial Ovarian Cancer IVD Before End of Year). Here are the details:
Abbott Labs before the end of the year plans to debut its Architect HE4 assay, which is designed to help oncologists monitor patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, the most common form of the disease. [The company recently submitted] the immunoassay for regulatory approval with FDA. The company is betting the blood-based assay will be indicated to help docs "monitor for the recurrence or progression" of epithelial ovarian cancer. The test, currently an investigational device in the US, is expected to be "the first automated HE4 test available in US," according to Abbott....The HE4 biomarker is known to exist at "high levels in the blood of some ovarian cancer patients" and is believed to offer what Abbott calls "the highest sensitivity and specificity of any other marker" for the disease. It is also considered to be one of the best single markers for stage 1 of the disease....According to Abbott, because certain types of ovarian cancers "rarely express HE4," the Architect HE4 "should not be used as a cancer screening test." Rather is designed "to be used as an aid in monitoring recurrence or progressive disease in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, and must be used in conjunction with other clinical data." According to Quest, CA 125 is "currently the serum marker most widely used to monitor therapeutic response and to detect disease recurrence in patients treated for epithelial ovarian cancer."
If HE4 can only be used as an ovarian cancer monitoring test and not a screening test, why would Abbot develop an automated version of it? The number of patients being monitored for cancer progression or recurrence is relatively small when compared to other more female neoplastic disease such as breast cancer. Moreover, HE4 would need to compete with another better established test, CA 125, for this specialized test business. However, it may be possible that the company anticipates that the assay HE4 may, in time, have a much broader application.
As noted above, HE4 is only of value for monitoring epithelial ovarian cancer. Epithelial ovarian cancer is the most lethal form of gynecologic cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer death among women in developed countries, claiming about 15,000 lives in the United States each year (see: Early detection of ovarian cancer using group biomarkers). The two other major types of ovarian cancer are germ cell and stromal cell tumors. Because these latter lesions are derived from different ovarian cell types, they do not express the same antigens as the epithelial tumors. Perhaps we should anticipate the emergence of a set of biomarkers, an IVDMIA, that can reliably identify all three cancer types at an early stage and therefore have utility for broad ovarian screening programs.














Knowing the facts to fight cancer is the first step. I have been battling with ovarian cysts for about 2 weeks now I read the ovarian cyst miracle review. It had lots of advice and has helped so far.
Posted by: Leelah King | March 11, 2011 at 01:00 PM
I think it is a wonderful idea to help people with cancer. I myself have been fighting with whats known as ovarian cysts for over a month now.
Posted by: Leelah King | March 11, 2011 at 12:33 PM
Rising levels on your test results can be, but are not always worrisome. Although changes in tumor marker levels may give you cause for alarm, other non-cancerous diseases can cause test results to vary. Conditions in the lab that processes your test may also throw off the results. Always talk to your oncologist about your test results and keep asking questions until you understand how these results will impact your prognosis and treatment plan.
Posted by: Online Generic Viagra | October 14, 2010 at 01:42 AM
usually don’t normally post on many another Blogs, nevertheless I just has to say thank you… keep up the amazing work. Ok regrettably its time to get to school.
Posted by: Ovarian Cyst | July 08, 2010 at 10:28 PM