The Wall Street Journal recently ran a fascinating article on the increase in binge drinking with special attention to Cardiff, Wales (see: U.K. Drinking Problem Gets Political; subscription required). One of the take-home lesson in it was that much of the excessive drinking by the youth in the U.K. was related to cheap alcoholic beverages offered in supermarkets, causing the pubs compete by lowering their prices. Contained in the article was a fascinating chart tracking alcohol consumption in OECD countries. I present it here for your review.
Spend a little time examining these data. Here are just a few of my own observations and questions:
- Note the decline in alcohol consumption in Turkey as the country has moved from a secular political orientation to broader adoption of Islam.
- I was under the impression that alcohol consumption was high in most Scandinavian countries, but it's actually relatively low in Sweden and Norway. I wonder if these countries have taken steps in to reduce consumption. Denmark and Finland seem to be the exception to this rule with consumption closer to continental Europe among the OECD countries.
- I wonder if the substantial rise and decline in Iceland is due, in part, to its recent meteoric economic rise in affluence and subsequent crash?
- I am not sure how to explain the fact that some of the EU countries plus the U.K. lead the pack in the alcohol race. Among them, France seems to be making some progress in decreasing consumption.
- Although binge drinking, a major thrust of the article, can result in serious social problems, the long-term health problems are even more serious. They were not addressed in the article.
- Like tobacco use, high alcohol consumption can be controlled, in part, by higher excise taxes. The U.K seems to be going in the wrong direction with competition for the lowest priced alcoholic beverages. Previous blog notes have raised the issue of taxes on soda pop by state legislatures and the federal government (see: State Taxes on Soda Pop Gain Momentum; Does the End Justify the Means?; Federal Tax on Soda Pop Proposed: Can This Be Justified?).














What's interesting though is that the definition of 'binge drinking' is not discussed. Oddly enough, my undergraduate research and thesis (later published) centered on alcohol 'addiction' and binge drinking. Saving the boring details ~ what is termed binge drinking versus a more generalized 'alcohol life-style' has a dramatic effect on how one can view and interpret such social settings. I say this not to discount or refute the concerns of the article, but rather to caution those drawing conclusions from the words...there is more that needs to be revealed/ evaluated in such settings.
Posted by: L. Needham | April 16, 2010 at 12:35 PM
Nice post. I read this article last week (when on vacation and having the opportunity to actually read the WSJ!) and thought it was interesting that there was some support from pub owners to increase taxes on alcohol to curb the availability of low-priced alcohol in supermarkets as well as closing pubs earlier (like it was before). The problem of people being served when they are obviously already drunk seems to be limited in the U.S. by the fear of liability (i.e. lawsuits) to bars that serve someone drunk who then kills someone in a car accident--perhaps one of the positive things of our litiginous society. Still, the article missed an opportunity to mention the health consequences of binge drinking.
Posted by: Mark Pool | April 14, 2010 at 10:18 AM